This might be rubbish – maybe his measurements have been debunked – but, given the eyewitness descriptions, it’s food for thought until we get proof of two 767s hitting the WTC. (Mind you, you’d think that if they were going to switch planes, they’d use the right one.)
Note that this page is only really meant for anyone who has already realised that “9/11” was not the event we are led to believe. If you still believe the official story, this stuff is easily scoffed at – instead please look at the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers.
This kind of ‘conspiracy theory’ detail is repellent, I know, for “anti-conspiracy theory” people but it’s just that: detail. Whether or not 767s hit the WTC towers is immaterial to the rest of the case against the official story. Well, if it was proven that they were not 767s, that would blow the official story apart. But it’s just one tiny part of an accumulation of evidence - and if any one of them is true, the official story is not.
Few “9/11 truthers” entertain the possibility of remotely controlled planes, or even claim they were not 767s — it is far from being evidence upon which the case against the official story rests.
One of the most important 11 September 2001 researchers, Kevin Ryan, though, does suspect they used remotely flown aeroplanes. Still, other than the videos and the eyewitnesses, we have no evidence of that, as far as I’m aware, and until they tell us how they did it, we can only speculate.
Anyway, the first thing that many people say about the idea the planes were remotely flown is that the very idea is completely fucking nuts!
No. That’s not crazy. What is crazy is doing the whole “9/11” event in the first place. Once you’ve decided to do “9/11”, doing it the best way you can is perfectly ‘sane’ and reasonable. If you can fly planes remotely, then one of your options is to fly planes remotely. More on that here later.
Now, have you heard about Operation Northwoods?